Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:51 pm
Its not a myth, its in the FAM (Foreign Affairs Manual) and its used often: See
9 FAM 40.63 N4.7 Applying the 30/60 Day Rule
(TL:VISA-342; 01-08-2002)
a. In determining whether a misrepresentation has been made, some of the
most difficult questions arise from cases involving aliens in the United
States who conduct themselves in a manner inconsistent with
representations they made to the consular officers concerning their
intentions at the time of visa application. Such cases occur most
frequently with respect to aliens who, after having obtained visas as
nonimmigrants, either:
(1) Apply for adjustment of status to permanent resident; or
(2) Fail to maintain their nonimmigrant status (for example, by
engaging in employment).
b. To address this problem, the Department developed the 30/60-day rule.
This rule is intended to facilitate adjudication of these types of cases
consistent with the statutory mandates.
c. Aliens who apply for adjustment of status pursuant to the INA are within
U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 - Visas
9 FAM 40.63 Notes Page 6 of 21
the jurisdiction of the Immigration and Naturalization Service unless the
application is abandoned upon the departure of the alien from the United
States. Upon receipt of a notice of application for adjustment of status
Form G-325A, Biographic Information, therefore, it would not be
appropriate for a consular officer to seek the Department's concurrence in
a finding of ineligibility since such a finding would not be binding upon the
INS. Instead, the post should bring available derogatory information to
the attention of the appropriate INS office by a VISAS DECEMBER cable.
[See 9 FAM 40.63 PN2.]
d. With respect to the second category referred to above, the fact that an
alien's subsequent actions are other than as stated at the time of visa
application or entry does not necessarily prove that the alien's intentions
were misrepresented at the time of application or entry. As to those who
fail to maintain status, the consular officer should also recognize that the
precise circumstances under which the change in activities or the
overstay arose have an important bearing on whether a knowing and
willful misrepresentation was made. The existence of a misrepresentation
must therefore be clearly and factually established by direct or
circumstantial evidence sufficient to meet the "reason to believeâ€