Clapoti wrote:Rommsey wrote:Clapoti wrote:Reba wrote:but you'll swear an oath to a stripey flag?
Or the constitution. a 200 years old outdated document![]()
Hehehe that's even worse than to swear oath on a person IMO
Outdated? Nope, it's still a highly applicable document that defines the freedoms and guidelines for the government that Americans live with. Additionally, the Queen's role in Canada is long outdated.
For being an old document, it's the basis for many constitutions and charters world wide. Canada's own Charter is based off of it. Strange, ours was created in the 1980s.
Nobody care about the queens except people like you who don't understand that she's not doing anything anymore in Canada.
And the Constitution is one of the oldest worldwide and doesn't reflect anymore the needs of today. It is also not the basis for constitutions and charter around the world, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is.
How are you going to prove to the people on this forum that I don't understand the Queen's capacity among Commonwealth nations? Then again you're only passing judgment from an ignorant assumption. Do you want me to start assuming nonsense about you?
The US Constitution highly reflects the needs of today. This is why you see countries all over the world base their Constitutions on it. This is why you see the USSC refer to it time after time to guide the country from a judiciary standpoint.
The UDHR is not backed by any force if needed. The UN GA states it is merely an advisory document that shares their view. Interestingly enough the document places the United Nations hypocritically above its own law. For such a Universal Declaration, it's strange that it fails to represent the interest of all cultures and societies.
Listen. I didn't sign up here to defend myself from people attacking me or what I want to do. I also didn't sign up for a discussion on political science or global events either. I asked for help and so far, the help has been little.



Privacy Policy