Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:34 pm-
This is a direct reaction to the post made by Mauricio regarding the Purdue MBA Program at GISMA.
I am a member of GISMA MBA Class of 2008 and I say that the statements made by "Mauricio" are ridiculous.
The statements made in this post are false and I am going to address each and every one of them.
1) The program being extremely quantitative is a shortcoming:
I really do not see why this is a problem. I even think that this is one of the strengths of the program. Finance, Accounting, Quant Methods – are basic skills that an MBA must have to succeed in today’s business environment and the Purdue MBA program at GISMA really makes sure you got this nailed. If you’re weak in this area, then this program might not be for you.
2) But scores very poorly when it comes to soft skills and networking:
I totally disagree. There were plenty of opportunities to network. There were MBA Career Fairs, Company Presentations, Company Field Trips, and Dinners with Alumni. There were also a lot Electives focused on the development of soft skills, i.e. Leadership, Negotiations, Cross-Cultural Management, Managerial Communications, etc.
3) Furthermore, GISMA lacks true MBA ambience. The school is very small.
What GISMA had, which is having a small class of 48, shows that the school is highly selective. Also, a small class has the benefit of more student-professor interaction and more opportunity to participate in class discussions. Thus, you get exposed to a lot of ideas from different perspectives making discussions a whole lot richer. This is what I experienced and I really have no clue why this is a problem.
4) If it were not enough, it's not easy to find a more boring place than Hannover.
This is highly subjective. A big city like NY or Hong Kong can be boring if you don’t have friends at all. I never found Hannover to be boring because there were always friends to hang-out with. Also, there were plenty of things to do with friends, like hang-out in the lake, barbeque in the park, hang-out in beer gardens, play football or badminton, clubbing, etc.
5) The way it recruits MBAs (more from under-developed countries than developed countries):
I think GISMA admits students based on a very clear set of criteria. If the best qualified applicants turned-out to be mostly from developing countries, I really don’t see why that is a problem. A good mind is a good mind; it doesn’t matter where it came from. And the claim that GISMA recruits students from developing countries in order to provide low cost labour for German companies is just ridiculous!
6) German and American students are oftentimes in the "Dean's List" and secretly enjoy special privileges.
Students who WORK HARD get rewarded to be in the “Dean’s List” regardless of country of origin. For the Class of 2008, they come from – Germany, Croatia, Romania, Mexico, Philippines, India, Bulgaria, Moldova, Colombia, and the States. Each one of them deserved to be there.
7) The academic director is the best example of what a manager shouldn't be.
I think this is a very unfair statement. Mauricio couldn’t have been in a position that allowed him/her to develop a reliable opinion on this matter.
8) That most students lack leadership, entrepreneurship, soft skills, and even social skills.
This is not what I observed. This class is full of future leaders and entrepreneurs. I really have no idea where “Mauricio” got this notion.
Again, I say that the statements made by "Mauricio" are ridiculous.
If you are a prospective MBA student, I trust that you are smart enough NOT to form an opinion about GISMA based on his/her statements
Yours Sincerely,
Karyn Gonzales (Philippines)
MBA 2008 / GISMA Business School