Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:10 am-
Wow, it's like déjà vu!
Basically, their statute sucks and I've already written to the Nevada AG about it. Write to the AG in Carson City and lend your voice to the chorus. The law says you must have an I-94 to get a licence, but it's written too tightly. They never took into account the entry categories that are unique to Canadians that either don't require an I-94 or the I-94 doesn't really indicate much.
The problem is that the Nevada legislature only meets once every two years, so it will take forever to get sorted out, they have some power to fiddle with it by regulation but the legislation itself is quite tightly drawn. It's a new law, so I suspect they are prepared for the fact they will have to amend it.
It's largely the fault of the Dept. of Homeland Security who issued silly legal advice to States on how to comply with the Real ID Act.
Some States (e.g. Florida) actually bothered to read the federal legislation, so in Florida you can get a DL valid for a year just by presenting a Canadian passport, and New Mexico is the only State that used the "alternate" provisions of the Real ID Act which allow them to issue DLs that are purely that (i.e. they cannot be used at airports to let you on the plane) without all the other identifying paperwork.
_________________
Steve.