TNVisaExpert wrote:Ask them how they are determining the one year status - when you can have unlimited renewals.
It's because of the Real ID Act, what most States are doing is amending their laws so your DL can only remain valid until the expiry date on your I-94. I think the majority of States now take this position, the few exceptions are New Mexico, Texas and Florida (and a few others that have yet to have their legislatures meet on the issue, although there are bills pending).
Florida specifically took note of Federal law, because you do not necessarily have to get an I-94 when you get a TN-1 entry, so they looked at the situation more intelligently and Canadian citizens can get a Florida DL that is valid for a year from the date of application, rather than until the date the I-94 expires. This gives applicants a bit more flexibility, because it means you don't have to tie your DL renewal religiously to your TN-1 renewal.
New
Mexico is I think the only State that has used the "alternative" provision in the Real ID Act, which allows States to issue DLs to undocumented aliens provided the DL is readily distinguishable (via colour) from an ordinary DL.
I'm in correspondence with the Nevada AG at the moment attempting to explain that it is possible for Canadians to enter the US in categories other than B-1/2 without an I-94, so their law that requires aliens in a non-immigrant classification who are resident in Nevada to present an I-94 is unworkable. I picked Nevada because their law is particularly inflexible, in many States the regulations are made by the AG or other agency under a rule-making provision in the law, however in Nevada, the law specifically states that no DL shall be issued to a person who is not a US citizen other than as provided under some very tough regulations.
Nevada also doesn't recognise many other States DLs when you apply for a Nevada licence, such as Texas and New Mexico.
Steve.