Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:07 am-
Sunny wrote:
And, I don't agree with the politics here and the level of bureaucracy - the acceptability of saying something but doing the opposite.
Perhaps I'm romanticizing how we dealt with things back home, but I just don't remember having to watch my back or play all these games when i worked in Canada.
What are others thoughts on this?
In the UK there are so many laws and regulations that basically they have become "fads" rather than laws, which means people pay lip service to the law because if you actually tried to follow all the laws to the letter you would probably go mad. End result of high population density, lots of laws.
I lost count of the number of laws that came into force that were vigourously enforced for a few months then forgotten about. Then someone would say there needs to be a law just like that law and people would have forgotten there already was a law and it didn't work.
The one law the UK really needs is more controls on alcohol, came to that conclusion years and years ago. All this CCTV, "anti-social behaviour orders", never ending increases in criminal penalties, controls on fireworks, guns, knives, etc. ad naseum. And now they have speakers on the CCTVs telling people not to litter, etc.
How about banning kids from possessing alcohol (which is legal, they just can't buy it or consume it on licensed premises) or banning consumption in public places or banning open containers in vehicles, even?
All these facist police state laws are a result of public disorder, and stopping drunk kids running riot with tougher controls on booze would sort it out. Why they don't do it I have no idea (taxes from businesses in towns that would be stuffed without it, probably). Go to any town centre on a Saturday night and you're ankle deep in empty beer cans.
_________________
Steve.