Thanks for your reply. The company does not have a presence in the US so my husband should be OK in that regard. The other stipulation, "neither you nor the company can be benefitting from your phyical presence in the US", is a bit foggy to me. What exactly does this mean? Do you have an example? The job is data analysis, which can be done anywhere. The fact that he'd be doing it in the US and not in Canada offers no benefit to either my husband or the company. If anything, it makes things slightly more difficult - harder to keep in touch with co-workers, company has to pay for flights/lodging when my husband travels to Canada etc... The only benefit to my husband is that it would allow him to remain with his family. Thanks!
AGN wrote:The principle to follw -- for all work in US that is not specifically covered by one's status, is as follws:
The company you are working for must have no presence in US.
Neither you nor the company can be benefiting from your physical presence in US.
Only if these 2 clauses are satisfied can one even think of doing thios work in the US without a work authorization.
Your header is a bit misleading: you WILL be working IN the US. The fact that the employer is in canada does not change this.